Decision making

This talk explores the critical role of architectural decisions in agentic security, emphasizing how these foundational choices impact the overall security posture of AI systems. It delves into the complexities of building secure AI by design, highlighting the need for robust frameworks and thoughtful consideration of security implications from the outset. The core thesis revolves around the idea that effective agentic security is not an add-on but a fundamental architectural requirement.

This talk addresses the challenge of maintaining consistency and understanding in software development, particularly with the advent of AI agents. It proposes a system for capturing and enforcing decisions using established documentation practices like Architecture Decision Records (ADRs), Product Requirements Documents (PRDs), and Behavior-Driven Development (BDD). The core thesis is that by formalizing why and how decisions are made, developers and AI agents can operate more effectively and consistently.

This talk introduces context graphs as a method to enhance AI agent decision-making beyond simple document retrieval. Context graphs store not only factual information but also past decision traces, precedents, and causal chains. This allows agents to make more informed and explainable decisions by understanding the reasoning behind previous choices, acting with a form of subject matter expertise.

This talk introduces context graphs as a method to enhance AI agents' decision-making capabilities. By integrating knowledge graphs with AI agents, the goal is to move beyond simple knowledge provision to enabling agents to understand and act upon rules and policies, thereby making more informed decisions. This approach aims to fill the gap in AI agents' reasoning by providing them with the necessary context and decision-making frameworks.

This talk explores the potential pitfalls of rapid software development fueled by AI, emphasizing the importance of deliberate decision-making and high-quality craft over sheer speed. It argues that while AI tools can accelerate development, they may lead to a proliferation of mediocre or confusing products if not guided by a strong sense of taste and user focus. The conversation highlights the need for engineers to maintain a critical perspective, prioritizing user needs and product quality even as development cycles shorten.

This talk explores the challenges and potential pitfalls of using AI agents in software development, arguing that while these tools offer significant productivity gains, they can also introduce subtle forms of friction that undermine code quality and engineering judgment. The core thesis is that intentionally reintroducing certain types of friction is crucial for maintaining control, ensuring quality, and leveraging human experience in an agent-assisted development workflow.

This talk introduces Command Code, a coding agent designed to learn and adapt to an individual developer's unique coding style and preferences, referred to as "taste." Unlike standard AI coding assistants that provide generic code, Command Code aims to internalize a developer's decision-making process, preferences for tools, and architectural choices. This is achieved through a meta-neuro-symbolic reinforcement learning approach, creating a more personalized and efficient coding experience.

This talk outlines the challenges and solutions for building scalable evaluation systems for AI, particularly in mission-critical domains like healthcare where errors have significant consequences. It emphasizes the limitations of traditional human review and offline datasets, advocating for real-time, reference-free evaluation methods to ensure customer trust and enable rapid response to issues.