World's Fair 2026
Recursive Coding Agents - Raymond Weitekamp, OpenProse
Overview
This talk introduces recursive coding agents, applying the principles of Recursive Language Models (RLMs) to enhance the reliability and capability of AI agents for coding tasks. The core thesis is that current AI agents, while intelligent, are "mismanaged geniuses" lacking a robust system for specifying, managing, reusing, and verifying their work. RLMs offer a new paradigm for inference-time computation by unifying tool calling and reasoning, enabling agents to recursively break down and solve complex problems.
Who should watch
- AI Engineers
- Product Managers
- Builders working with AI agents
- Those facing challenges with AI agent reliability and outcome delivery
- Developers interested in advanced agent orchestration and reasoning
Key takeaways
- The primary bottleneck for AI agents is not intelligence but reliable outcome delivery, necessitating better management and verification of their work.
- Recursive Language Models (RLMs) treat the context as the object of computation, merging tool calling and reasoning to operate symbolically on large inputs.
- RLMs can process information orders of magnitude larger than their context window and act as powerful memory systems without modification.
- A small model running as an RLM can outperform frontier models as a standard LLM on long-reasoning tasks by leveraging code execution and recursive sub-agent calls.
- Recursive coding agents, an application of RLM principles, allow coding agents to call themselves, enabling deeper problem decomposition and execution.
- Projects like DSPy, AXE, and OpenProse are exploring RLM concepts for coding agents, with OpenProse enabling any agent with a file system and sub-agents to function as an RLM.
- Dynamic workflows in tools like Claude Code and the OpenProse language can convert existing coding agents into RLMs, enhancing their recursive capabilities.
- Reliability is key to trust in AI agents; recursive coding agents offer a path towards more dependable and reusable AI workflows by capturing and operationalizing successful "golden sessions."
Notable quotes
*The intelligence is there, and the missing layer is how do we specify and manage and reuse and verify the work.*
*RLMs are the new reasoning models and I see this as the next paradigm of test time compute.*
*Trust is reliability. How can we trust something that isn't reliable?*
Unofficial community note. Prefer the recording for nuance.